Steelers Mock Draft, Parish 3.0: The one where the Steelers take a QB


NCAA Football: Senior Bowl
Vasha Hunt-Imagn Images

While we may not recommend it, there’s enough smoke around the Steelers taking a QB to check on how it could play out.

We’re just one week away from draft night, and the Steelers have been hiding their cards well thus far. What we do know is they’ve been doing their homework on a number of positions, including quarterback.

In a previous mock draft, I explained that I like using mock drafts as a tool. They can help us familiarize ourselves with the draft board, and track how specific choices can drastically alter the flow of decision making.

While I’m certain to get some snide comments for this one, I wanted to explore what a draft could look like if the Steelers did, in fact, take a quarterback in Round 1. To be clear, this is not my preference nor meant to be taken as a prediction. However, there’s been enough smoke around the idea that I felt it was worth working through the scenario.

I have not allowed trades in previous mocks, but we’ll be changing that for this one. I couldn’t bring myself to draft a quarterback without making some additional moves to supplement that big and risky of a commitment. I also banned any players that I had picked in my previous mock. If you’re going to take the time to read another draft simulation, the least I can do is give you some different names.

Now with that all out of the way, let’s get to drafting.

TRADES!

  • PIT receives picks R2.34, R3.65, and R4.105 & NYG receives R1.21 and R4.123
  • PIT receives R1.32 & PHI receives R2.34 and R5.156

Our phones are ringing with both Shedeur Sanders and Jalen Milroe still on the board at pick 21. Both the Giants and the Browns are trying to get back into the late half of the round. for a quarterback. This is somewhat of a risky proposition because the team we are trading with will be taking one of the quarterbacks off the board. Still, I think my preferred quarterback will be there for us, so it should be worth the risk.

I’m in no hurry to help the Browns out of their quarterback purgatory, but the Giants offer us an intriguing opportunity. We can temporarily trade out of the first round, pick up an additional third, and upgrade our fourth-round pick by 18 spots.

With the Giants sending pick 34 in our first trade, we can then turn around and flip it with a fifth rounder to get back into the first. Securing a shot at that fifth-year option is crucial if we’re looking to maximize a rookie quarterback’s contract, and the Eagles are game to let us back into the first for a relatively cheap price.

Round 1, Pick 32: Quarterback Jalen Milore, Alabama

NCAA Football: ReliaQuest Bowl-Alabama at Michigan
Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images

Full transparency, I’m in the camp that would prefer the Steelers avoid drafting a quarterback in the first round this year. However, that defeats the purpose of this exercise, so I’m going with Jalen Milroe.

I’ve shared my thoughts on Sanders, Dart and Milroe in this week’s Read & React, so you can check that out if you want more detail. The short version here is that if I’m pushed to take a quarterback, I want one who has a special trait about them. Sanders and Dart don’t, in my opinion, so I’ll take the upside swing on Milroe.

Milroe throws a good deep ball, which meshes with the Steelers’ identity, and provides truly game-breaking ability as a runner. Milroe isn’t as consistent with his accuracy as you’d like, but to my eye, that can be attributed to some of his footwork mechanics, which is fixable.

If he can sit and develop for a year while working in some packages similar to what we saw Justin Fields do last season, he’s the player I’d most believe could develop into more than they currently are.

Round 3, Pick 65: Defensive tackle Alfred Collins, Texas

NCAA Football: CFP National Playoff First Round-Clemson at Texas
Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

The last time the Steelers picked a nose tackle from the University of Texas, it turned out pretty well. Collins is one of my favorite players in the draft and fans of Casey Hampton will appreciate Collins’ work as a nose tackle.

One thing Collins offers that Big Snack didn’t is height and length. Collins measured in at 6’6 and 332 pounds with 34 5/8” arms. Collins is able to 2-gap against the run, and is phenomenal at stacking and shedding blockers. He’s developing as a pass rusher and with his long limbs, Collins is always a threat to swat the ball down.

For a Steelers team looking to fix its run defense, but that was unwilling to spend big in free agency, landing Collins with this pick would be a coup.

Round 3, Pick 83: Running Back Damien Martinez, Miami

NCAA Football: Wake Forest at Miami
Sam Navarro-Imagn Images

The Steelers brought in nine running backs as part of their 30 pre-draft visits. Martinez was not one of them, but the Steelers do not exclusively draft prospects they’ve had an official visit with, so he’s my pick here. Martinez checks a lot of boxes for me. He’s a big physical runner with plenty of agility to pair with it. He’s one of the younger running back prospects, having turned 21 in January. He’s also found success running in both zone and gap schemes.

By pairing him and Collins together in the third round, I’m pretty happy coming away with two starting-caliber players in positions of need.

Round 4, Pick 105: Safety Jonas Sanker, Virginia

NCAA Football: Virginia at Pittsburgh
Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images

The Steelers have also been doing their homework on this safety class. If they’re looking ahead to the expiration of DeShon Elliott’s contract after this season, they’ll be leaning more towards a box-style safety.

Sanker brings a ton of college experience and physicality to the room. He projects as a future starter who is already considered a dependable gunner on special teams. In 2025, he can star on special teams and mix in on sub-packages as he earns more playing time. For more on Sanker, check out my Draft Gems series entry on safeties.

Trade!

  • GB receives R6.185 and R7.229 & PIT receives R6.198, R7.237, R7.250

As we hit this point in the draft, I was still feeling like there were a handful of holes on the roster I wanted to take a stab at filling. After finding a willing trade partner in Green Bay, Pittsburgh drops a combined total of 21 spots to gain an extra pick. It’s not a move that’s going to win any GM of the Year awards, but by playing the board, I was able to address depth at three positions of need instead of two.

Round 6, Pick 198: Wide Receiver Chimere Dike, Florida

NCAA Football: Louisiana State at Florida
Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images

Dike (pronounced Dee-Kay) is a player I think has been slept on quite a bit. I’m thrilled to get him in the final round. Dike is a vertical threat, and I think he has more route-running chops than Wisconsin and Florida utilized. Dike is also a willing blocker, which could aid him in an effort to win snaps over smaller players Calvin Austin and Roman Wilson.

Round 7, Pick 237: Cornerback Zah Frazier, UTSA

COLLEGE FOOTBALL: NOV 15 North Texas at UTSA
Photo by John Rivera/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

Frazier is an older prospect with only one year as a starting cornerback in college, but when you get this late in the draft, who really cares? At this point, we’re betting on upside, and nothing screams upside like a 6’3 corner with 32 7/8” arms, a 4.36 40-time, and six interceptions in 2024.

Round 7, Pick 250: Offensive Tackle Jalen Travis, Iowa State

Texas Tech Red Raiders v Iowa State Cyclones
Photo by Luke Lu/Diamond Images via Getty Images

Finally, we wrap this exercise up with a developmental tackle prospect. Jalen Travis is a 6’8, 339-pound tackle with long 34 7/8” arms. Travis is a developmental project with experience in zone running schemes. While he isn’t going to be threatening to start in 2025, the Steelers should continue taking swings at a premium position.

Picks Recap


What do you think of this result? Love it? Hate it? Let me know in the comments!

Aaron Rodgers Still Considering Retirement; QB Remains In Contact With Steelers

Throughout the 2025 offseason, Aaron Rodgers‘ future has loomed as a talking point. The future Hall of Famer remains unsigned one week before the draft, and nothing is imminent with respect to where (if at all) he will play in 2025.

Rodgers has remained quiet since the end of last season, but on Thursday he made his latest appearance on The Pat McAfee Show. The 41-year-old touched on a number of subjects, including repeated references to the fact he has several ongoing commitments in his personal life. In large part as a result of that, no firm decision has been made with respect to signing with an interested team or hanging up his cleats.

“I am trying to be open to everything and not specifically attached to anything when it comes to this decision,” Rodgers said (via Tom Pelissero of NFL Network). “I’m not holding anybody hostage… I’m just going through a lot in my personal life that has to take precedent at this point.”

Rodgers said his face-to-face meeting with new Jets head coach Aaron Glenn and general manager Darren Mougey did not go as he envisioned. It was then that he learned of the team’s decision to move on, by means of a conversation which ended very quickly and which Rodgers added was lacking in respect. New York ultimately released him with a post-June 1 designation, but before that move officially took place he has been free to speak with potential employers.

On that note, Rodgers confirmed he has had conversations with the Giants, Vikings and Steelers about a potential deal. He noted a willingness to play for $10MM in 2025, adding he is not insistent on receiving a multi-year deal to continue his career. Considering the current market for quarterbacks, a one-year commitment in that price range would certainly be feasible for any number of suitors. Several dominoes have already fallen amongst signal-callers, however, and more vacancies will be filled during the draft. Despite what Rodgers termed positive conversations with the likes of Brian Daboll, Kevin O’Connell and Mike Tomlin, therefore, nothing is certain regarding an agreement being worked out.

The Giants have added Russell Wilson and Jameis Winston, and they could add a long-term option in the form of a rookie next week. The Vikings – reported last month to be Rodgers’ preferred landing spot – could stand to bring in a veteran as J.J. McCarthy insurance, but Minnesota has remained publicly comfortable with handing the reins to last year’s No. 10 pick. That leaves the Steelers as a logical landing spot, especially given owner Art Rooney II‘s comments about signs pointing in the direction of a deal.

Pittsburgh could stand to add under center, and Tomlin remains in contact with Rodgers (as the latter confirmed today). The team has not imposed a deadline for a decision, but with the draft approaching the Steelers’ Day 1 plans in particular could depend on which direction Rodgers leans. After making an offer early in free agency, Pittsburgh’s proposal is not believed to have shifted. To little surprise given his other comments, though, Rodgers said the draft will not alter his approach with respect to his playing future.

In other words, the Steelers could add a developmental option as early as the first round next week while still remaining open to a Rodgers signing. The four-time MVP added he is OK with teams moving forward with alternate plans under center, particularly as it pertains to bringing in a rookie. Presumably, a shrinking market for his services would have an impact on his willingness to suit up in 2025, though. To that end, CBS Sports’ Aditi Kinkhabwala reported on a recent 93.7 The Fan appearance that Rodgers would rather retire than join a team which is not a Super Bowl contender.

Evaluating the candidacy of teams for a dee postseason run in 2025 will of course be easier after the draft takes place, but it does not appear as though any movement on the Rodgers front will be seen by that point. With retirement still on the table, the wait for further developments will continue.

Parish Mock 3.0: The One Where the Steelers Take A QB


NCAA Football: Senior Bowl
Vasha Hunt-Imagn Images

While we may not recommend it, there’s enough smoke around the Steelers taking a QB to check on how it could play out.

We’re just one week away from draft night, and the Steelers have been hiding their cards well thus far. What we do know is they’ve been doing their homework on a number of positions, including quarterback.

In a previous mock draft, I explained that I like using mock drafts as a tool. They can help us familiarize ourselves with the draft board, and track how specific choices can drastically alter the draft board.

While I’m certain to get some snide comments for this one, I wanted to explore what a draft could look like if the Steelers did, in fact, take a quarterback in Round 1. To be clear, this is not my preference nor meant to be taken as a prediction. However, there’s been enough smoke around the idea that I felt it was worth working through the scenario.

I have not allowed trades in previous mocks, but we’ll be changing that for this one. I couldn’t bring myself to draft a quarterback without making some additional moves to supplement that big and risky of a commitment. I also banned any players that I had picked in my previous mock. If you’re going to take the time to read another draft simulation, the least I can do is give you some different names.

Now with that all out of the way, let’s get to drafting.

TRADES!

  • PIT receives picks R2.34, R3.65, and R4.105 & NYG receives R1.21 and R4.123
  • PIT receives R1.32 & PHI receives R2.34 and R5.156

Our phones are ringing with both Shedeur Sanders and Jalen Milroe still on the board at pick 21. Both the Giants and the Browns are trying to get back into the late half of the round. for a quarterback. This is somewhat of a risky proposition because the team we are trading with will be taking one of the quarterbacks off the board. Still, I think my preferred quarterback will be there for us, so it should be worth the risk.

I’m in no hurry to help the Browns out of their quarterback purgatory, but the Giants offer us an intriguing opportunity. We can temporarily trade out of the first round, pick up an additional third, and upgrade our fourth-round pick by 18 spots.

With the Giants sending pick 34 in our first trade, we can then turn around and flip it with a fifth rounder to get back into the first. Securing a shot at that fifth-year option is crucial if we’re looking to maximize a rookie quarterback’s contract, and the Eagles are game to let us back into the first for a relatively cheap price.

Round 1, Pick 32: Quarterback Jalen Milore, Alabama

NCAA Football: ReliaQuest Bowl-Alabama at Michigan
Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images

Full transparency, I’m in the camp that would prefer the Steelers avoid drafting a quarterback in the first round this year. However, that defeats the purpose of this exercise, so I’m going with Jalen Milroe.

I’ve shared my thoughts on Sanders, Dart and Milroe in this week’s Read & React, so you can check that out if you want more detail. The short version here is that if I’m pushed to take a quarterback, I want one who has a special trait about them. Sanders and Dart don’t, in my opinion, so I’ll take the upside swing on Milroe.

Milroe throws a good deep ball, which meshes with the Steelers’ identity, and provides truly game-breaking ability as a runner. Milroe isn’t as consistent with his accuracy as you’d like, but to my eye, that can be attributed to some of his footwork mechanics, which is fixable.

If he can sit and develop for a year while working in some packages similar to what we saw Justin Fields do last season, he’s the player I’d most believe could develop into more than they currently are.

Round 3, Pick 65: Defensive tackle Alfred Collins, Texas

NCAA Football: CFP National Playoff First Round-Clemson at Texas
Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

The last time the Steelers picked a nose tackle from the University of Texas, it turned out pretty well. Collins is one of my favorite players in the draft and fans of Casey Hampton will appreciate Collins’ work as a nose tackle.

One thing Collins offers that Big Snack didn’t is height and length. Collins measured in at 6’6 and 332 pounds with 34 5/8” arms. Collins is able to 2-gap against the run, and is phenomenal at stacking and shedding blockers. He’s developing as a pass rusher and with his long limbs, Collins is always a threat to swat the ball down.

For a Steelers team looking to fix its run defense, but that was unwilling to spend big in free agency, landing Collins with this pick would be a coup.

Round 3, Pick 83: Running Back Damien Martinez, Miami

NCAA Football: Wake Forest at Miami
Sam Navarro-Imagn Images

The Steelers brought in nine running backs as part of their 30 pre-draft visits. Martinez was not one of them, but the Steelers do not exclusively draft prospects they’ve had an official visit with, so he’s my pick here. Martinez checks a lot of boxes for me. He’s a big physical runner with plenty of agility to pair with it. He’s one of the younger running back prospects, having turned 21 in January. He’s also found success running in both zone and gap schemes.

By pairing him and Collins together in the third round, I’m pretty happy coming away with two starting-caliber players in positions of need.

Round 4, Pick 105: Safety Jonas Sanker, Virginia

NCAA Football: Virginia at Pittsburgh
Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images

The Steelers have also been doing their homework on this safety class. If they’re looking ahead to the expiration of DeShon Elliott’s contract after this season, they’ll be leaning more towards a box-style safety.

Sanker brings a ton of college experience and physicality to the room. He projects as a future starter who is already considered a dependable gunner on special teams. In 2025, he can star on special teams and mix in on sub-packages as he earns more playing time. For more on Sanker, check out my Draft Gems series entry on safeties.

Trade!

  • GB receives R6.185 and R7.229 & PIT receives R6.198, R7.237, R7.250

As we hit this point in the draft, I was still feeling like there were a handful of holes on the roster I wanted to take a stab at filling. After finding a willing trade partner in Green Bay, Pittsburgh drops a combined total of 21 spots to gain an extra pick. It’s not a move that’s going to win any GM of the Year awards, but by playing the board, I was able to address depth at three positions of need instead of two.

Round 6, Pick 198: Wide Receiver Chimere Dike, Florida

NCAA Football: Louisiana State at Florida
Matt Pendleton-Imagn Images

Dike (pronounced Dee-Kay) is a player I think has been slept on quite a bit. I’m thrilled to get him in the final round. Dike is a vertical threat, and I think he has more route-running chops than Wisconsin and Florida utilized. Dike is also a willing blocker, which could aid him in an effort to win snaps over smaller players Calvin Austin and Roman Wilson.

Round 7, Pick 237: Cornerback Zah Frazier, UTSA

COLLEGE FOOTBALL: NOV 15 North Texas at UTSA
Photo by John Rivera/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

Frazier is an older prospect with only one year as a starting cornerback in college, but when you get this late in the draft, who really cares? At this point, we’re betting on upside, and nothing screams upside like a 6’3 corner with 32 7/8” arms, a 4.36 40-time, and six interceptions in 2024.

Round 7, Pick 250: Offensive Tackle Jalen Travis, Iowa State

Texas Tech Red Raiders v Iowa State Cyclones
Photo by Luke Lu/Diamond Images via Getty Images

Finally, we wrap this exercise up with a developmental tackle prospect. Jalen Travis is a 6’8, 339-pound tackle with long 34 7/8” arms. Travis is a developmental project with experience in zone running schemes. While he isn’t going to be threatening to start in 2025, the Steelers should continue taking swings at a premium position.

Picks Recap


What do you think of this result? Love it? Hate it? Let me know in the comments!

Aaron Rodgers names his price for Steelers, other potential suitors


Miami Dolphins v New York Jets
Photo by Al Bello/Getty Images

The four-time MVP named his asking price

The Pittsburgh Steelers – Aaron Rodgers saga continues on.

When it was announced that the four-time MVP would be appearing on The Pat McAfee Show on Thursday, many thought this month-long wait may come to an end one way or the other. That didn’t happen.

Among other things, Rodgers talked about his final meeting with the New York Jets, which featured an awkward back-and-forth with head coach Aaron Glenn, a talk with New york Giants Brian Daboll, and several conversations he’s had with the Steelers and Mike Tomlin.

One thing Rodgers wanted to set the record straight on was the amount of money he was willing to play for, taking offense to reports saying he wanted $40 million.

“I told every single one of the teams it ain’t about the money,” Rodgers said. “I said I’ll play for 10 M’s.”

$10 million for Rodgers is obviously a much more appealing deal than spending $40 million, but there is still no decision made one week before the NFL Draft.

Shedeur Sanders reportedly didn’t impress Steelers


Colorado v Kansas
Photo by Ed Zurga/Getty Images

The Colorado quarterback reportedly didn’t make a good impression

The Pittsburgh Steelers made waves last week when they hosted Colorado quarterback Shedeur Sanders to a pre-draft visit. And while a good portion of Steelers fans would love to see Sanders slide to No. 21 and get selected by Pittsburgh in the 2025 NFL Draft. That said, NFL Insider Aaron Wilson says he is told the meeting between Pittsburgh and Sanders didn’t go well.

“I’ve heard he will not be a Pittsburgh Steeler, Wilson said. “I heard that meeting did not go well.”

Wilson added this information didn’t come from someone who would intentionally try to affect the stock of Sanders to help a certain team land him.

Sanders went on Up & Adams after his meeting with Pittsburgh and seemed to think the meeting went great.

“I enjoyed my time here in Pittsburgh,” Sanders said. “I think I connected well with all the coaches and it was real fun.”

Sanders added that his visit “was a 10” when asked how well it went.

The Steelers obviously need a long-term answer at quarterback. If Sanders is there at No. 21 and they love him, they’ll take him. The more likely outcome, though, is that Sanders is gone before then and Pittsburgh waits until the 2026 NFL Draft to make a move for their future quarterback.

NFL draft profile 2025: Shedeur Sanders (Quarterback, Colorado)


Quarterback Shedeur Sanders #2 of the Colorado Buffaloes warms up prior to a game against the Kansas Jayhawks at Arrowhead Stadium on November 23, 2024 in Kansas City, Missouri.
Photo by Ed Zurga/Getty Images

Is Sanders the Steelers’ next franchise quarterback?

Approaching the 2025 NFL Draft, we’ll be scouting as many of the top prospects that the Pittsburgh Steelers could have their eye on anywhere from Rounds 1 through 7. We’ll break down the prospects themselves, strengths and weaknesses, projected draft capital and their fit with the Steelers.

Colorado quarterback Sheduer Sanders’ college career has been a strange mix of overrated (the Colorado media machine and name recognition) to over-hated (the Colorado media machine and name recognition) up to this point. The draft process has been no different, with Sanders’ stock landing everywhere from a top-five pick to a potential Day 2 selection; suddenly, the Steelers at No. 21 are a viable landing spot. Should Pittsburgh be interested in the polarizing Colorado passer?

The basics on Shedeur Sanders

  • Position: Quarterback
  • Class: Senior
  • Size: 6’1 1/2”, 212 pounds
  • Age: 23
  • Projected draft round: 1

Stats via Sports Reference


Shedeur Sanders scouting report

It’s finally my turn to wade into the Shedeur Sanders discourse. He’s a confusing evaluation, and the football-famous last name— he’s Hall of Famer Deion Sanders’ son — doesn’t make it any easier.

For one, it might be a bit of a surprise that Sanders, the son of one of the best pure athletes in NFL history, isn’t all that mobile and is at his best as a more traditional pocket passer.

Sanders completed a whopping 74% of his passes in 2024, and while a good bit of Colorado’s passing offense was short throws and screens, there’s no denying his efficiency. The ball doesn’t hit the ground much. Sanders had his misses, but he’s at his best dissecting defenses over the middle in the short to intermediate passing game. When he has some time to throw, he’s incredibly accurate and generates great velocity on his passes.

Another key bit of context: The Colorado offensive line was a hilariously rough watch in 2024. In many cases, that made Sanders tough to evaluate as he was constantly running for his life. Put him on a team with just an OK offensive line in the NFL, and it’ll be an improvement.

That constant pressure led to a bad drifting habit in Sanders’ game, though. He’s constantly backpedaling in his drop, even if he doesn’t need to. That leads to a number of issues. For one, it makes his offensive tackles’ jobs even harder, and it also affected his throwing power, hampered timing in the quick game, and limited his ability to read the field.

As you can see in the clips below, Sanders’ high sack numbers at Colorado are a mix of bad O-line play and his own underwhelming pocket awareness.

Sometimes, Sanders would big-play hunt instead of taking what was readily available or simply throwing the ball away to live another play.

On intermediate throws, Sanders displays good touch as well as the ability to place the ball to protect his receivers.

However (and I’ll add that I don’t have all-22, which makes this evaluation a bit more difficult), Sanders didn’t show much anticipation in the games I watched. He’s a see-it, throw-it passer even if his decision-making is generally above-average. He did miss a decent number of open receivers in 2024. But again, I think that’ll get cleaned up if he can improve his pocket presence.

That isn’t to say Sanders collapses under pressure. He constantly delivered while taking hits, and while he could improve navigating blitzes, his willingness to hold onto the ball and try to make plays is admirable.

However, Sanders simply doesn’t have the arm talent to consistently succeed making throws on the run or from difficult arm angles. And when he can’t step into throws, his velocity falters. Similarly, he doesn’t have the quick twitch to always evade defenders when escaping the pocket.

Sanders’ physical limitations further show up in the deep passing game. His 2024 is littered with underthrown deep balls. Some are victims of moving backwards, but some he stepped into and still couldn’t get enough distance.

To be fair, some of the throws in the clips below are incredibly challenging in terms of air yards. But Sanders constantly had plays like that — his arm strength is a concern, but he also plays like he doesn’t yet realize those limitations.

As a result, Sanders often ended up playing “hero ball” in 2024 when he didn’t have the skill set to do so. But credit where it’s due: Against Baylor, Sanders delivered some highlight-worthy plays, including a well-placed, sliding-outside-the-pocket Hail Mary to send the game into overtime (a matchup the Buffaloes eventually won).

Let’s not ring too many alarm bells here — Sanders has some well-thrown deep balls on tape. His arm strength isn’t optimal, but in the right offense it won’t be a major NFL limitation.

He’s also serviceable as a runner. He won’t ever stand out as a scrambler, but he’s far from a statue and can gain yardage where there’s a lane.

Sanders is full of personality, and paired with some of the quirks of the Colorado football program, it might not sit well with everyone. During his time as a Buffalo, he pushed a referee, appeared to poke a defender in the eye, and sent the infamous “Bro had to be very mid at best” Tweet about a former teammate. His dad has also coached him since high school. There are prospects in this class with far, far worse off-field questions, but there’s a reason to bring in Sanders for an interview.

However, overall, Sanders seems to be a fiery competitor. His toughness in the pocket confirms that. Plus, considering he’s been playing football as THE Deion Sanders’ kid his entire life, he’s had to endure a uniquely bright spotlight throughout his career — something that especially stood out during his heavily-discussed time at Colorado. There are questions as to how his game translates to the NFL level, but I’m confident he can handle the pressure.

Still, there’s a frustrating lack of high-level traits in his game. Realistically speaking, his ceiling is that of an efficient game manager. That’s not enough to deter teams from taking a chance on Sanders as a future starter, but it makes him firmly a Day 2 talent in my book, even if a quarterback-needy general manager is likely to snag him in the first round.

Shedeur Sanders strengths

  • Above-average accuracy
  • Good ball placement and velocity on short to intermediate throws
  • Multi-year starter with impressive production and limited turnovers
  • Functional mobility
  • Succeeded despite horrible pass protection; good toughness
  • Helped elevate a struggling Colorado football program

Weaknesses

  • Not a high-level arm talent; needs strong base to drive throws and questionable arm strength on deep passes
  • Lacks burst as a runner; won’t be escaping many pass-rushers in the NFL
  • Major drifting problem in the pocket; spotty pocket awareness
  • Was bailed out at times by strong receiving core (WR1 was best player in the draft Travis Hunter)
  • Needs to play with better rhythm in the short passing game
  • Hasn’t yet learned to play within his limitations
  • Less than ideal size (under 6’2)

What others are saying about Shedeur Sanders

Lance Zierlein of NFL.com

Any perceptions that Sanders is a product of Heisman Trophy-winner Travis Hunter’s greatness are slowly dispelled once you hit the tape. He’s seen mixed results under an intensely bright spotlight, but there are no signs his confidence has ever wavered. Sanders possesses a baseline of poise, savvy and accuracy, traits that are integral in becoming an NFL starter. He’s slow-twitch with standard arm talent and a longer release, but he worked around those limitations with anticipation and accuracy. He plays with decent command from the pocket and finds his rhythm when working on-time and on-platform; that said, he will pass on profits and look for the big play too often. Average velocity and slower rip times mean tighter windows against faster athletes, so throwing off-platform or trying to do more than his arm talent allows is ill-advised. He’s tough and willing to take the hit to complete the throw once he’s locked into his target. Sanders is pocket mobile and finds clean alternate launch points, but he often creates pressure and sacks with undisciplined pocket drops. The tape says he has the necessary qualities to become a solid game manager if he can operate with better discipline and play to his strengths.

Nick Akridge of PFF

Sanders flashed NFL ability at Colorado, and it’s that much more impressive when considering the circumstances. He elevated the program to new heights. However, his lack of consistent protection makes him difficult to evaluate. When he can stay on time, he’s an efficient quarterback who is willing to take hits in the pocket to deliver a pass. But he far too often takes himself out of rhythm because of his lack of belief in his protection. That play style will make it hard to succeed in the NFL. Still, if he can play on time more often, his accuracy and turnover avoidance can lead to a long, successful career in the NFL.

Kyle Crabbs The 33rd Team

Shedeur Sanders projects best into a timing-based offense that optimizes his field vision as a passer and his ability to deliver accurate passes on time. When in rhythm, Sanders makes it look easy on the gridiron and can pick apart defenses methodically. An offensive system that leans into that ability while encouraging him to mitigate some of his outside-of-structure moments stands the best chance to produce a quality starting quarterback. This is an NFL starter, likely on Day 1.

Shedeur Sanders’ fit with the Steelers

As I touched on in Read & React earlier this week, Sanders’ fit with the Steelers isn’t impossible, but it’s far from ideal. Sanders’ best shot to succeed in the NFL is in an efficient, timing-based short passing offense — but the Arthur Smith Steelers want to run the ball and capitalize on downfield opportunities. Two boundary deep threats in George Pickens and D.K. Metcalf drive that point home.

Sanders might be the most pro-ready quarterback in this year’s class, and that shouldn’t go unnoticed. The Steelers have done their homework on him with a top-30 visit, and that’s a good thing. However, I have a really hard time seeing him as a smart pick in the first round for Pittsburgh. The fit isn’t there, and neither is the upside.

TL;DR: Sanders is a capable pocket passer who dissected defenses on crossing routes in 2024 despite O-line play that made every dropback look like flying through a Star Wars asteroid field. However, he’s a limited athlete with average-at-best arm strength. He’ll likely need a very strong roster around him to become a true franchise quarterback at the next level.

What are your thoughts on Colorado quarterback Shedeur Sanders? And which draft prospects would you like to see profiled next? Let us know in the comments below!

NFL Insider: Aaron Rodgers more likely to retire before joining non-Super Bowl contender


Miami Dolphins v New York Jets
Photo by Luke Hales/Getty Images

Another update on what the future Hall of Famer may no.

The Pittsburgh Steelers continue to sit in the waiting room of Aaron Rodgers while he continues to weigh his options as the NFL offseason continues to roll by.

The NFL Draft is now one week away, and one would assume that Rodgers would have his mind made up one way or the other by then. CBS Sports Aditi Kinkhabwala provided an update on the situation in a recent appearance on 93.7 The Fan in Pittsburgh.

“Aaron Rodgers is more likely to retire than he is to come to a team that he doesn’t believe is a Super Bowl contender,” Kinkhabwala said.

She adds that if Rodgers truly believed the Steelers could win, why hasn’t he signed yet?

“If Aaron Rodgers said. ‘You know, that’s the place I’m going to go help reestablish an offensive identity…’ why would it not have already happened?”

Steelers fans are past impatient when it comes to Rodgers, and many would prefer they not sign the 41-year-old. Regardless, it feels like we’ll find out before the draft, as dragging this into OTAs and mini-camp would be incredibly counter-productive.

Your daily Steelers trivia game, Thursday edition



Think you can figure out which Steelers player we’re talking about? You’ll get five clues to figure him out in our new guessing game!

Hey Steelers fans! We’re back for another day of the Behind the Steel Curtain in-5 daily trivia game. Game instructions are at the bottom if you’re new to the game! Feel free to share your results in the comments and feedback in this Google Form.

Today’s Behind the Steel Curtain in-5 game

If you can’t see the game due to Apple News or another service, click this game article.

Previous games

Wednesday, April 16, 2025
Tuesday, April 15, 2025
Monday, April 14, 2025

Play more SB Nation in-5 trivia games

NFL in-5
MLB in-5
MMA in-5

Behind the Steel Curtain in-5 instructions

The goal of the game is to guess the correct Steelers player with the help of up to five clues. We’ll mix in BOTH ACTIVE AND RETIRED PLAYERS. It won’t be easy to figure it out in one or two guesses, but some of you might be able to nail it.

After you correctly guess the player, you can click “Share Results” to share how you did down in the comments and on social media. We won’t go into other details about the game as we’d like your feedback on it. How it plays, what you think of it, the difficulty level, and anything else you can think of that will help us improve this game. You can provide feedback in the comments of this article, or you can fill out this Google Form.

Enjoy!

Pro Football Rumors 2025 NFL Mock Draft

The pool of prospects available for teams later this month delivers an interesting challenge for anyone making a mock draft. This year’s crop of players has been viewed as far more deep than it is top-heavy, with only 15-20 players receiving first-round grades in most scouting departments. Because of this, we’re left with a fun uncertainty in which any of several players with second- to third-round grades could hear their names called throughout the back half of the first round.

Here, we’ll make an attempt to identify the best prospects for each team in their draft slot and with their position needs. Because we’re in a rare and fun scenario at the moment in which every team holds its own first-round pick for the first time in a long, long time, we will not be predicting any in-draft trades, but you can read here about the possibilities for such trades happening at the tail-end of the first round.

1) Tennessee Titans — QB Cam Ward, Miami (Fla.)

Let’s not overthink this one. The Titans have a need at quarterback, unless they’re fully willing to run through the 2025 NFL season with Will Levis as their leader under center. While top-ranked prospects like Colorado’s Travis Hunter and Penn State’s Abdul Carter are certainly worthy picks here, it makes a bit too much sense to just address the most important position in football.

Ward has run away with the honor of being the best quarterback prospect in this year’s class. Year after year, Ward has progressed from Incarnate Word to Washington State to Miami and has played better and better football at each step of his journey. The well-traveled passer has his shortcomings as a prospect, but there is no reason to believe he won’t continue to improve and excel at the next level.

Ward here would give the Hurricanes their first first-round pick on offense since David Njoku in 2017 and their first No. 1 overall pick since the Cowboys took defensive lineman Russell Maryland in 1991. He would be bringing the best arm in the draft to Tennessee to spread the ball out behind a slowly improving offensive line.

2) Cleveland Browns — WR Travis Hunter, Colorado

I was extremely tempted to go with Hunter’s quarterback, Shedeur Sanders, at this pick. Star pass rusher Myles Garrett was a big critic of the team’s chances to contend for a title, largely due to the Browns’ quarterback situation. It felt like the only thing that could convince him to make a hard U-turn on this thinking (besides money) would be if team brass had clued him in to a plan to address the position. At this point, though, Sanders has begun to slide down a lot of boards and could be available via trade from the early second round back into the late first. We’ve also seen the Browns express interest in Alabama passer Jalen Milroe, who could be another candidate to add a fifth-year option to his contract with a trade into the first round.

Instead, we’re going with Hunter. It is strange to think we could have two players going Nos. 1 and 2 who began their collegiate careers at the FCS level, but here we are. Cleveland general manager Andrew Berry reportedly views Hunter primarily as a wide receiver, making him an exciting weapon to pair with Jerry Jeudy.

Strong ball skills combined with explosiveness and an ability to make tacklers miss make Hunter a scary edition to a group that already includes Jeudy and Njoku. While they need a quarterback to distribute the ball, that problem may be addressed later in the round. There’s a chance the Browns try to utilize Hunter’s unicorn ability to play both sides of the ball in the NFL, but we know his offensive abilities are what Cleveland primarily values.

3) New York Giants — OLB Abdul Carter, Penn State

While ultimately an easy decision, it is likely not one the Giants would prefer. Ward, Hunter, and Carter are, by a wide consensus, considered the surefire top three picks of this draft in some order. Though, it’s always possible another quarterback sneaks his way in due to desperation from Cleveland or New York. The Giants would likely love to add Hunter as a shutdown, true No. 1 cornerback, but with the 2024 Heisman winner in Cleveland, Carter is far and away the best prospect left on the board at this point. Any other pick here would be a reach. The only thing to watch out for here is the fact that general manager Joe Schoen was lucky to retain his job this offseason, and he may feel the need to do something bold in order to keep his job like going after Sanders or Ole Miss quarterback Jaxson Dart.

There is not a huge need for Carter in New York. Despite the loss of Azeez Ojulari in free agency, the team still rosters Brian Burns and former top-five pick Kayvon Thibodeaux. The two only combined for 14 sacks in 2024 and only have two double-digit sack seasons between them. That said, the Giants have invested a lot in the pass-rushing duo and likely intend to keep utilizing the pair. Little depth exists behind them and adding Carter to serve as a third edge rusher seems underwhelming for a No. 3 pick. The Giants do have a past of making such moves, as Mathias Kiwanuka (2006) and Jason Pierre-Paul (2010) joined John Mara-run teams that had strong edge-rushing units already. It would be foolhardy for New York to pass up the last elite talent left in this draft.

4) New England Patriots — T Will Campbell, LSU

Here’s where the draft can become really interesting. Now that the top prospects are off the board, we get a little more into speculation on team preference and fit. While New England was dead last in team sacks in 2024, it made strong additions in former Titan Harold Landry and ex-Eagle Milton Williams. Because the Patriots already invested a lot in the defensive line through free agency, they use this draft slot to address another area of weakness: the offensive line.

FA pickup Morgan Moses is set to lock down his side of the line, slotting Michael Onwenu at right guard. Former Vikings center Garrett Bradbury should start, as well, allowing Cole Strange to return to his role as starting left guard with Layden Robinson providing depth on the interior. Vederian Lowe and Caedan Wallace could both receive opportunities to start at left tackle, as each was part of last season’s merry-go-round at the position. But new head coach Mike Vrabel admitted that the draft could be a useful tool to improve at the position.

Campbell started at left tackle for all three of his seasons in Baton Rouge. While analysts criticized Campbell’s lack of length as a detriment to his first-round status, scouts don’t believe it to be an issue that would prevent him from having a successful NFL career at left tackle. He heads north to New England, where Lowe or Wallace would be in place as a stopgap if the seasoned SEC blocker needs any acclimation time. Considering 2025 will be a crucial developmental year for Drake Maye, it would stand to reason Campbell would step in immediately.

5) Jacksonville Jaguars — DT Mason Graham, Michigan

Jacksonville’s biggest holes are at tight end, linebacker, and maybe safety, but none of the top prospects at those positions feel worthy of going fifth overall. The best player on the board at this point is Graham, and while defensive tackle may not be a gaping hole, it’s a spot at which the Jaguars could use an upgrade.

Graham was the top-ranked interior defender in the NCAA last year, per Pro Football Focus, and this was not a breakout year; he ranked fifth in 2023. Graham can be disruptive as an inside pass rusher, totaling nine sacks and 18 tackles for loss in three seasons, but he is an elite run defender — the NCAA’s best, per PFF — and would be pivotal to a unit that finished 25th in run defense in 2024. With Josh Hines-Allen and Travon Walker in place on the edge, Graham pairs with Arik Armstead to form the team’s most menacing defensive line since its 2017 “Sacksonville” crew.

6) Las Vegas Raiders — RB Ashton Jeanty, Boise State

There’s work to be done at a number of positions in Las Vegas, but running back seems to have the biggest need for improvement. The other position I considered here was defensive tackle, but Graham is off the board, and I think Jeanty adds more to the running backs group here than Derrick Harmon or Walter Nolen would add to the defensive line. Plus, with a decent O-line and a lack of elite wide receivers in the class, the new brain trust of general manager John Spytek, head coach Pete Carroll, and minority owner Tom Brady will need to find some way to add a weapon for new quarterback Geno Smith.

A lot will be expected of Jeanty in 2025 after he carried the Broncos to the College Football Playoff last year. Hopes that some combination of Alexander Mattison and Zamir White would make for a passable run game proved misplaced as the Raiders finished dead last in rushing in 2024. Vegas added Raheem Mostert to improve the room in free agency, and though he’s only a season removed from a 1,000-yard rushing campaign in which he led the league in rushing touchdowns with 18, the veteran speedster took a backseat last year in Miami. He would do so again here behind Jeanty, whose run at Barry Sanders‘ hallowed single-season Division I-FBS rushing record (2,628) fell just 27 yards short.

7) New York Jets — T Armand Membou, Missouri

It is extremely tempting to go with Jaxson Dart here. Post-Aaron Rodgers, the Jets are once again trying to figure out their future at quarterback. At the moment, though, they seem decently positioned with Justin Fields set to start and experienced backup Tyrod Taylor behind him. New York even rosters former Florida State star Jordan Travis as a potential underrated pick to develop. Ultimately, Dart would feel like a reach, especially if Fields continues to improve as a starter. Instead, the team decides to add a piece to protect its new starting passer.

Membou would enter a really good situation in New York. A combination of center Joe Tippmann, left guard John Simpson, and right guard Alijah Vera-Tucker anchored an impressive interior line in 2024. Olu Fashano, the team’s pick at No. 11 overall last year, should step up at left tackle, where he started five games last year. If Membou is ready, he can step in as the starting right tackle right away. If not, Chukwuma Okorafor is available to fill in until Membou develops.

8) Carolina Panthers — LB Jalon Walker, Georgia

We know that Carolina is likely to focus on defense in this year’s draft, and its biggest weaknesses currently reside in the linebacking corps, where the team has plenty of bodies but lacks elite talent. Safety, wide receiver, and tight end seem to be other positions at which the team could add, but unless the Panthers want Tyler Warren out of Penn State, none of those positions feature prospects that fit at this point of the draft.

The team’s weakness in the linebacking corps applies to both the off-ball group and the edge-rushing stable. Josey JewellChristian Rozeboom, and Trevin Wallace man the inside linebacker spots, while Jadeveon ClowneyPatrick JonesD.J. Wonnum, and DJ Johnson comprise the outside linebacker corps. Aside from Clowney, none of the Panthers’ OLBs have proven to be entirely effective as starters. Walker is the perfect addition. Playing 311 snaps as an off-ball linebacker and 249 as an edge rusher in 2024, the Bulldogs standout’s versatility across the defense is reminiscent of Micah Parsons. The Panthers will get to determine at which spot Walker offers the greatest potential to help.

9) New Orleans Saints — QB Jaxson Dart, Ole Miss

Sanders is trending heavily here, especially following the injury update to veteran starter Derek Carr, but hear me out. Dart makes so much more sense here. To get it out of the way: there are weaknesses on New Orleans’ offensive line (namely at guard), cornerback, and defensive tackle, but Carr’s situation makes quarterback a direr need. While initially the team was linked to Day 2 passers like Texas’ Quinn Ewers, the situation seems to necessitate a Day 1 move.

Now, back to the Dart-Sanders argument. This doesn’t boil entirely down to the fact that the two’s draft stocks have been moving drastically in opposite directions for weeks, but that is noteworthy. New head coach Kellen Moore has worked with three quarterbacks in the past three seasons: Dak PrescottJustin Herbert, and Jalen Hurts. Moore’s experience is with big-bodied passers with deep-ball and rushing abilities, two facets Sanders has seen criticized about his game. Sanders carries only average arm strength and plays conservatively. He also did not inherit his father’s electric speed and finished at Colorado with negative rushing yards (sacks count against rushing yards in college). Dart is a much more willing and accurate deep-ball thrower and has far more ability as a rusher.

If Carr is able to play in 2025, all the better to sit and develop Dart responsibly. If not, Dart stands a much better chance at finding success with a relatively weak offensive line and a bevy of offensive weapons than Sanders.

10) Chicago Bears — TE Tyler Warren, Penn State

Adding center Drew Dalman and guards Joe Thuney and Jonah Jackson to a line bookended by an impressive pair in Darnell Wright and Braxton Jones solidifies a group that was suspect in 2024. Upgrades could be made along the defensive line, but Gervon Dexter and Grady Jarrett are serviceable on the interior while Montez Sweat and Dayo Odeyingbo both have more potential than they showed in 2024. It is tempting to go with Georgia’s Mykel Williams or Marshall’s Mike Green here to add more pass-rushing bodies, but the best safety blanket you can provide a young, growing quarterback like Caleb Williams is a talented tight end, and Warren is too good a prospect to fall outside of the top 10.

Now, I know Cole Kmet exists and earned a four-year, $50MM extension after a career year in 2023, but last season brought Kmet’s worst work since his rookie year. His contract includes a potential out following the 2025 season that would allow them to cut him with only $3.2MM in dead cap. Drafting Warren here provides Williams with a top-tier weapon, one coming off a 1,233-yard receiving season, and gives the Bears a chance to determine whether or not they’re able to move on from Kmet should his down 2024 turn out not to be an anomaly.

Read more

Steelers Read & React: What if Pittsburgh drafts a QB?



The Steelers appear to be keeping all of their options open for the first night of the draft. This week R&R answers: if it has to be a QB, which one are you most comfortable with?

The 2025 NFL Draft is inching closer, and suddenly, Colorado quarterback Shedeur Sanders is on Pittsburgh’s radar. Could the once-projected top-10 pick really fall to No. 21, or is that discussion another victim of tired draft talking points?

In this week’s Read & React, Ryan and Ryland take a look at the Steelers’ best options at quarterback if the team does indeed select that position in the first round. Plus, a look at Keeanu Benton’s 2024:

If the Steelers have to take a quarterback at pick 21, and you had your pick, would you select Shedeur Sanders, Jaxson Dart, or Jalen Milroe?

Shedeur Sanders #2 of the Colorado Buffaloes runs with the ball during the first half against the Oklahoma State Cowboys at Folsom Field on November 29, 2024 in Boulder, Colorado.
Photo by Andrew Wevers/Getty Images

RP: While I don’t think either Ryland or I would prefer to use pick 21 on this particular crop of quarterbacks, the Steelers have been doing their homework on quarterbacks. That included bringing in Dart and Sanders for pre-draft visits and taking Jalen Milroe and a few of his Alabama teammates out to dinner around the time of Alabama’s pro day.

Maybe this is all an elaborate smoke screen to obscure who they really want, or perhaps it’s an act meant to entice other teams to trade up. Pittsburgh would benefit from a trade back and several of the prospects they’ve brought in are projected as fringe first round prospects, meaning they could be available early on Day 2 if a team like the Giants decides it wants to trade back into the first.

But, it could also be genuine smoke. We all know the Steelers are desperately in need of their next franchise guy. While fans may view drafting Kenny Pickett in 2022 as a cautionary tale, would any of us be surprised if the team took a different lesson from that experience?

If pushed to pick one of these three quarterbacks, my decision would come down to how the Aaron Rodgers situation plays out. While I don’t think Rodgers signing should prevent the Steelers from drafting a quarterback if they truly believe in them — having Rodgers around changes who I would take.

I’ll start by eliminating Jaxson Dart from the equation. I’m out. I could be swayed into Dart if the cost was lower, but at 21 I just can’t do it. A first round quarterback needs to be a high level processor or a freak athlete, and Dart is neither.

Mississippi’s offense doesn’t ask much of the quarterback compared to others. In Lane Kiffin’s offense, the quarterback is responsible for making a pre-snap read to determine who has the best matchup. If that look changes after the snap or fails to get open, Dart was given the green light to take off or improvise. It just isn’t an offense that translates well to the next level and we’ve seen it crash and burn before. Right or wrong, Dart’s pre-draft cycle is giving me Zach Wilson flashbacks, and I don’t think Arthur Smith’s offense will be the best fit for him.

That leaves Sanders or Milroe.

To me, Sanders is the play if Rodgers pulls the rug out from under the Steelers. Sanders has the higher floor, but his athletic traits also limit his ceiling. Sanders has put on tape the ability to read a defense and progress through his route progressions in a timely manner, but his arm strength is average, as is his mobility. Neither should be prohibitive to NFL success, but they’re also hard to get too excited about.

What makes him a difficult evaluation were his surroundings.

Did he take a lot of sacks because his offensive line was bad or because he played too much hero ball? Did he play too much hero ball because of bad decision making or because his coaching staff didn’t provide him many answers when the first read wasn’t there? Did Colorado run a lot of plays near the line of scrimmage because that’s all Sanders could handle or because that’s all the offensive line could give him time for? Is it weird that he’s really only played for his Hall of Fame father?

These are all valid questions. I tend to think Sanders is the most pro ready of our three options, but I still view him as a second-round talent. If Rodgers leaves Pittsburgh high and dry, Sanders should be able to compete with Mason Rudolph for the starting spot. If Sanders is the pick, the Steelers should be incentivized to see what they have as soon as possible. If it works out, we’re happy. If not, move on and try again in 2026.

However, if Rodgers does sign, Jalen Milroe would be the pick for me. I can already hear the angry typing in the comment section, but hear me out.

I’ve been around this site long enough and talked with enough Steelers fans to know there is a decent amount of fans who lament the Steelers passing on Lamar Jackson in 2018. While I don’t want to imply that Milroe is the same player as Jackson, they do have some similar qualities. Jackson was more advanced as a passer coming out than Milroe is currently, but Jackson’s accuracy and processing were heavily debated in NFL circles. And while Milroe isn’t as elusive of a runner as Jackson, his unofficial 4.37 40-time would make him one of the league’s fastest. A year ago, I questioned if Jayden Daniels’ running style would play at the NFL level, and how did that turn out? Again, Daniels was lightyears ahead of Milroe as a passer, but you can see the vision.

Milroe at 21 would be hard to stomach, but I’d rather bet on special traits in the first round if forced to pick a quarterback. Milroe has that with his mobility. I don’t believe Sanders or Dart have any comparable traits in their toolbag.

If Milroe was allowed to sit a year and was utilized in some short yardage situations like the Steelers had Justin Fields run towards the end of the season, I’d feel a lot better about it. Get him in the building and see if you can develop his accuracy. He already throws one of the better deep balls in this class, why not see if you can develop his touch in the short to intermediate areas? It’s not likely, but I’d rather go down betting on special traits than higher floors, and for what it’s worth Milroe is regarded as a smart player. He won the “academic Heisman” with a 3.52 GPA and his Alabama coaches have spoken highly of his character and leadership during this cycle. That doesn’t guarantee success, of course, but it’s still good to hear.

If the Steelers do end up picking a quarterback, my hope is that they are honest with themselves moving forward. Picking out of desperation is not a recipe for success. Neither is sticking with a quarterback who doesn’t have the goods just because you picked him high. If I’m the Steelers, I’d be open to drafting a quarterback again in 2026 and beyond until they’re certain they’ve found their guy.

RB: I’m more or less in agreement with Ryan on all points here. In terms of physical traits, I’d rank the three quarterbacks Milroe, Dart, and Sanders from first to last; then reverse those rankings when it comes to the finer details of quarterbacking and NFL-readiness.

Still, after watching all three passers more in-depth ahead of this article, I came away confident in my evaluation that none of the three have first-round grades.

But I can’t answer “none” here, can I?

If that’s the case, I’d agree with Ryan that I have a very hard time drafting Dart in the first round. He’s bigger and more athletic than Sanders with a better arm, but he still lacks any true standout traits and played in an offensive system that will make his NFL transition difficult. A clear Day 2 talent, in my opinion.

I was pretty sure heading into this question that I’d answer Sanders, but I’ve been working on my draft profile of him and have become a bit disillusioned with his upside. It’s true that he’s accurate and efficient in the short and intermediate passing game, but his arm talent and mobility are far from what you like to see in the first round. Plus, some painful pocket habits limit the stuff he’s good at already.

A lot of NFL analysts who I respect see Sanders’ realistic ceiling as a good-not-great NFL starter, and I have the same takeaway. You can win games with that, but the NFL is a league driven by star quarterbacks. I think a first-round pick at that position needs to have some elite abilities.

Milroe has the latter in spades. High-level arm strength. Special athlete. Still not that great at quarterback. Armchair GM Ryland, through gritted teeth, says this is the pick if it has to be one of those three quarterbacks in the first round. Might as well bet on sky-high potential, even if the bust potential is beyond high.

But if I’m actually a GM here, I’m probably going with Sanders. I don’t want to get fired, and Sanders has the best chance at actually turning into a solid starter of the three — and we’ve seen good rosters take quarterbacks in that category to big games.

Sanders would not be a horrible pick at No. 21, and at the end of the day, you can’t fault a team that doesn’t have a long-term solution at quarterback for trying to find one. Maybe he cleans up his pocket habits, hones his processing, and becomes a lethal distributor of the football in the NFL. But that can be said of quarterbacks in every draft class.

Also, Sanders is a questionable fit in Pittsburgh’s offense, which ostensibly wants vertical shots downfield, outside the numbers; Sanders is at his best picking defenses apart with short passes in the middle of the field.

Frankly, I like Louisville quarterback Tyler Shough’s tape more than Dart, Sanders, or Milroe’s, but with his age, injury history, and lack of production, I’m staunchly against a first round pick for the soon-to-be 26-year-old, either.

For the time being, Sanders remains my QB2. But I don’t think the Steelers should start thinking about a dice roll at the position until Day 2 or later.

Steelers in review: DT Keeanu Benton

Keeanu Benton #95 of the Pittsburgh Steelers looks on from the field during an NFL football game against the New England Patriots at Acrisure Stadium on December 7, 2023 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Photo by Cooper Neill/Getty Images

Welcome to R&R’s newest segment: Steelers in Review. The need to keep an accurate view of last season can get lost in the news cycle of free agency and the draft. As a result, we’ll be looking at one Steeler’s 2024 season in each segment, noting where they succeeded, where they struggled, and what they’ll bring to the roster in 2025. This week, we’ll be looking at defensive lineman Keeanu Benton.

RB: When Benton was drafted in the second round in 2023, he was a draft darling for many, including myself. Following a modest rookie year, the hope was Benton would take a big step forward in 2024 with Cam Heyward continuing to get older and Larry Ogunjobi clearly not a long-term piece.

However, while Benton didn’t suffer a clear sophomore slump in 2024, he certainly didn’t show major improvement, putting up stats identical to his rookie season with 16 solo tackles, 20 assists, and one sack. Entering 2025, Heyward is one year older despite still playing at a high level, and Ogunjobi is off the roster. Defensive line is the most popular draft need among Steelers fans.

Often described as a defensive end miscast as a nose tackle in the Steelers scheme, Benton is seen as a player who still has a good bit of upside if given the chance to succeed. However, while he did play 202 snaps at nose tackle in 2024 per PFF, his other 460 were elsewhere on the D-line — he could be used better, but he wasn’t exactly a fish out of water in 2024.

As usual, Ryan and I will be splitting up the analysis. I’ll start off by looking at Benton’s work as a pass rusher.

The first game of his I watched was Week 5 versus Dallas, where his first snap showed off a wicked club move to speed by the Cowboys’ center. Benton’s hand usage and placement are still a work in progress, but there’s no doubting his powerful upper half.

Benton won quickly with that move once or twice a game, but the rest of his pass-rushing snaps were significantly less exciting. He simply doesn’t have a great arsenal of moves, and was stalled on a disappointing number of one-on-ones in the games I watched.

That’ll be something that Benton needs to continue to hone; the good news is he’s only 23 years old and I’m willing to be his best and most complete football is still down the road.

Benton’s play strength is far from a concern, as I’m sure Ryan will touch on in the run defense section below. However, he doesn’t win with power much and doesn’t push the pocket consistently as a rusher. Often, he just gets moved laterally and doesn’t apply any pressure on the quarterback. Some of it has to do with how his first step off the line could be consistently quicker, which would better convert speed to power.

However, there are some reps scattered throughout the season that show off a bull rush with some upside.

Still, he gets controlled by offensive linemen far too often and has a difficult time overall shedding blocks.

Benton just isn’t a great penetrating defensive lineman at this point in his career, but he is very mobile for his size and was often used to contain quarterbacks in the pocket, sometimes operating in a sort of “spy” role. For the most part, he was successful in that aspect of his game, moving laterally to cut off escape routes, even if Patrick Mahomes still found ways to succeed with last-second passes in Week 17:

That athleticism also makes him a capable contributor on stunts.

One part of Benton’s game that clearly shows the influence of Cam Heyward is his production batting down passes. Benton recorded an impressive six passes defensed in 2024, and in just about every pass-rush rep where he doesn’t get home, you can see him put his hands up in the air.

The last thing I’ll point out is Benton’s persistence; motor is not an issue and he consistently worked to chase down screens and continue to rush late in plays:

Benton is still growing into his role as a pass rusher, but he has all the physical tools to continue to trend in the right direction. He’s a solid starter right now but not a difference-maker up front.

Ryan, what did you see from Benton against the run? And how does his trajectory affect the Steelers’ roster need at D-line?

RP: There are some common themes in both phases for Benton. I’m reminded of our review of Troy Fautanu in that there are very few plays where I think Benton is getting bullied or losing badly. For this review, I first used NFL Pro to filter plays where he was on the field for a Steelers run stuff. That gave me an idea of his role in run defense when they were working their best. I then went and watched the run defense snaps of his worst graded game for run defense, the first game against Cleveland.

When he’s playing at his best, Benton is able to take on doubles to clear up his teammates and plug gaps. He wasn’t always a true 0-tech nose tackle, there are times the Steelers would have him line up in 1-tech or 2i.

Still, even in some of these successful reps, you can see some of Benton’s current limitations as a nose tackle. Benton’s got a powerful upper half, but he doesn’t have a strong anchor with his base. If he doesn’t pay attention to his pad level on a given rep, it can get him shuffling his feet. He was most susceptible to this when facing double teams.

Ryland had some critiques for Benton as a penetrator in the pass rush, but funnily enough, I think his ability to penetrate against the run is a strength of his. While I found myself critiquing his ability to take on double teams, put him one-on-one with the greenlight to get into the backfield, and that’s where Benton shines as a disruptor. On some of these reps he needs to improve ability to finish, but you can see the potential in his game.

All in all, I think Benton’s “sophomore slump” is a bit overblown. I still think he’s been miscast as a nose and would rather see him slide into Larry Ogunjobi’s old role, but he isn’t a detriment at nose tackle. If the Steelers keep him there, they need to work on his anchoring as he is a player that still seems more comfortable moving laterally and shedding than he is taking on double teams.

Join in on Steelers R&R by sharing your takes on this week’s topics. What quarterback is the Steelers’ best option in Round 1? Is Keeanu Benton a defensive building block? Let us know in the comments! Feel free to pitch future questions in the comment section or on Twitter/X: tag @_Ryland_B or @RyanParishMedia.